|
|
|
   |
|
|
|
|
|
My thanks to wattsuprc.com.au for the supply of the blades for this review.
Align recently released their wood compound 325 Pro blades, billed as highly
stiff and rigid wood compound but no mention of what they are suitable
for, so there's the first objective for the review.....
Shape : symmetrical
Length : 325mm
Width : 32mm
Weight : 40g / set |
|
|
|
|
|
The Align 325 pro blades are a wood compound composite material. They are
gray in colour which is different. The blade roots are plastic holders
around the wood blade itself. No brass bushings or similar for strength
in the blade root hole, the plastic supplying the strength for the blade
root. I also couldn't find any recommendations for maximum rotor speed,
so in this test it will get the standard 2850 RPM I run on my 4S T-Rex.
Fit and finish of the blades is very nice, with smooth lines and no way
of visibly telling that they are wood. In fact initially I thought they
were carbon (must learn to read the instructions).
Blade stiffness longitudinally is very good for a wood blade but more flexible
than carbon, although I have come across carbon blades that the less stiff
than these. Chordwise stiffness is not so good with quite a lot of flex.
I checked blade balance and it was very very close, so they were bolted
to the head and the addition of tracking tape was enough to have them spot
on.
Here are a few pictures of the blades followed by the flight experience
and summary.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight Testing
Having already tested these blades once and then discovering a fault on
one of the blade grips it was time to test them again. Hopefully the test
results would be more favorable now that the blade grip problem (that coloured
the first test) was resolved.
Conditions were not favorable for blade testing as temperatures with windchill
were close to freezing and the wind was blowing at a steady 15 mph with
gusts to 20 mph. Despite anything else this flight would be interesting
just because of the cold and wind. I had predicted particularly cold weather
before travelling to the field and had already warmed packs to help combat
bad performance due to the cold temperatures.
The first job was to get the tracking right. Initial tests showed that
one blade was flying about half an inch higher than the other. I adjusted
one of the links that goes from the swashplate to the flybar mixer in order
to correct this. Having made this correction I was very pleased to see
the blades track correctly. I could now move onto how the blades perform
in flight.
With the conditions getting worse in terms of wind strength the flight
would be limited to loops, rolls and some low-level flips. I also did some
high-power climbs and descents to get a feel for the power in these blades.
With the T-Rex in a steady hover I opened the throttle wide and accelerated
into a fast circuit. The initial climb out was quite strong and there was
no noticeable change in track of the blades and a good level of stability
in the circuit. The initial climb was not as snappy as one might expect
from a good set of carbon blades but it was very respectable for a set
of wooden blades. With the T-Rex in fast circuit I decided to just try
some tight turns and sudden cyclic movements to see how the blades would
react. Response was very fast, in fact faster than I am used to with heavier
carbon blades. There was a little blade noise in the tight turns but nothing
of concern.
Having taken note of the faster response on these blades I next tried an
into wind roll. Unsurprisingly for this level of wind I did lose most of
my forward speed in the roll but the roll itself was extremely quick. Following
this roll I tried a loop and again response was fast and the loop was quite
tight. Although much of this was caused by the quite strong headwind. Coming
down lower I tried some stationary flips and again was rewarded with some
quite fast flips, quicker than I am used to using heavier carbon blades.
Throughout all these moves the blades stayed in track and did not exhibit
any untoward characteristics. This confirmed to me that the earlier blade
tests were significantly affected by the problem with the blade grip.
In general these blades are faster to react to cyclic commands than carbon
blades. However, this also translates into a slightly less locked in feel
to the overall flight characteristics. The T-Rex feels lighter on its feet
and is more prone to buffeting in the wind. In general the whole machine
felt slightly less stable than with carbon blades, which is only to be
expected as these blades are significantly lighter.
Conclusion
In contrast to my previous review of these blades I have to say that Align
have finally produced a set of blades that I actually like. Although I
like them for more reasons than just their flight performance. The flight
performance itself is good and in fact far better than I was expecting
for a set of wood blades. My reasons for liking the blades is that they
give close to carbon performance at an extremely attractive price. I still
prefer carbon blades for that locked in and predictable feeling they give
but for practising new 3-D moves I might well have found an alternative.
I ran these blades at over 2800 rpm which for wood blades is unheard-of.
I was expecting that this level of rpm would cause problems for a wood
blade but was pleasantly surprised to be proved wrong.
The general flight characteristics are less stable than one might expect
with heavier carbon blades but in lighter winds I would probably have been
less concerned.
Given all of the above I can only highly recommend these blades as they
provide great performance at a very modest price. Certainly for practising
new moves I would consider using these blades as they would prove much
more cost-effective in the event of a crash but at very little expense
in terms of performance.
If you have these blades rate them using the TrexTuning rating system....... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance |
Number of ratings:
94 |
| Rating:
4.28 |
   
|
|
|
| Manufacturer Support |
Number of ratings:
24 |
| Rating:
3.67 |
   
|
|
|
| Durability |
Number of ratings:
35 |
| Rating:
4.34 |
   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value for Money |
Number of ratings:
59 |
| Rating:
4.69 |
    
|
|
|
| Build Quality |
Number of ratings:
46 |
| Rating:
4.26 |
   
|
|
|
| Overall Satisfaction |
Number of ratings:
60 |
| Rating:
4.62 |
    
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
   |
|
|